|
|
~EXECUTIVE SUMMARY~
The Rural Housing Institute (RHI) has prepared this
report on subprime lending as part of the Iowa Community Lender Partnership
Initiative. This project is an effort to better understand the
current nature of home mortgage lending in Iowa, educate consumers about
harmful mortgage products, and develop new partnerships between lenders
and the communities in which they do business. RHI intends to use this
study to encourage discussion and action that leads to the production and
fairly priced financing of more affordable, high-quality housing in Iowa.
After intensive study of seven Iowa counties, and a mortgage data review
of the entire state, RHI has concluded that subprime lending has increased
substantially in urban and rural Iowa over the past six years. Iowa, like
much of the upper Midwest, is home to many strong community banks that
fulfill many of the credit needs of their communities. However, subprime
lenders are making inroads in our communities. This raises caution flags
as we seek to increase home ownership among all Iowans. Subprime loans
have higher interest rates and usually higher fees. Borrowers with poor
credit records usually can not obtain loans at standard rates and find
that subprime loans are their only option. Unfortunately some types
of consumers with good credit and some equity in their homes are targeted
for subprime refinance loans. While some subprime loans are in the consumer’s
interest, others contain such high rates and fees that they end up harming
the borrowers and can rightfully be termed “predatory loans” because they
end up putting a borrower’s home in jeopardy.
RHI’s study of Iowa loans confirms some findings that are common to
other studies on this issue. Loans by subprime lenders are most commonly
entered into by low and moderate income and minority borrowers. African-American,
Native American and Hispanic borrowers in particular appear to be the targets
of some subprime lenders. Refinance loans are more likely to be made by
subprime lenders than home purchase loans. Certain groups of borrowers,
such as people buying mobile home are also very likely to receive loans
from subprime lenders.
On the other hand, RHI’s study contains the good news that subprime
lending has not infiltrated the most rural counties as deeply as feared.
This study illustrates that the currently available data often exaggerates
the presence of subprime lenders in non-metropolitan counties. There is
a significant amount of lending by small prime lenders that do not report
their loans to the Federal regulators as part of the Home Mortgage Disclosure
Act (HMDA). Their data, therefore, is not reflected in studies based solely
on HMDA. RHI believes this is good news because it means that rural Iowa’s
home ownership solutions are not dependent just on the large national lenders,
but can also be improved by partnerships between affordable housing groups
and local community lenders.
During the last decade, the percentage of Americans
who own their home has been gradually increasing. Because home ownership
provides low-and-moderate-income individuals with a base for developing
wealth and increases their civic attachment to their communities, RHI believes
that continuing this expansion of home ownership should be an important
component of the economic development goals for Iowa communities.
Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the housing secondary market giants, have estimated
that between 30% and 50% of borrowers of subprime loans actually have credit
records that should allow them to obtain prime loans. In these cases, home
equity that could be the basis for economic development in Iowa communities
is being drained away by lenders whose corporate offices are often far
away. In order to help Iowa homebuyers get the loan products that are
best for them, RHI proposes a three-pronged approach for future work on
this issue.
-
1. Expanded financial education and homebuyers
and home ownership counseling efforts in Iowa. RHI believes that Iowa’s
financial institutions, a wide range of non-profit organizations and foundations,
and state and local government have a role to play in funding and overseeing
additional efforts to prevent the financial abuse of our citizens. We
believe that general financial education should be available for all elementary,
high school and college students and for those populations, which are targeted
by subprime, car title and payday lenders. In addition RHI proposes
a coordinated home buyers and homeowners counseling effort that would strongly
encourage and provide incentives for every borrower to obtain home buyer
counseling before entering into loans which have high interest rates or
fees or other characteristics of “predatory loans.” RHI also believes that
home ownership counseling and support efforts for new homeowners who are
particularly vulnerable to the marketing of predatory refinance lenders
should also be increased.
-
2. Improved data reporting and collection procedures
to improve public monitoring and regulation of high cost loans. RHI
proposes a series of recommendations for state and local officials to develop
policies, regulations and laws that help better protect our citizens from
abusive lending. While there is a wealth of scattered data available, particularly
for the metropolitan areas, most information regarding rural mortgage lending
trends is not easily accessible or is difficult to collect. RHI proposes
stricter monitoring and regulation to help Iowa identify and correct the
financing problems that threaten the continued expansion of home ownership
in Iowa.
-
3. Improved partnerships between community
non-profit groups involved in affordable housing and socially responsible
lenders. Most current data indicates that consumers enter into
abusive loan situations because of the high pressure marketing of predatory
lenders, because they don’t believe that traditional lenders will be willing
to loan to them, and because of a lack of financial education. Traditional
lenders, with community ties, have a vested interest in developing the
wealth of their customer base and community groups are uniquely suited
to provide some of the services that can make that possible. RHI believes
that partnerships formed around financial education, getting the “unbanked”
to open bank accounts, home buyer and home ownership counseling, community
development efforts and the development of high-quality affordable housing
can create “win-win” situations for all parties. We also believe that small
community bankers and community groups working together can also improve
small bank utilization of the secondary market, use of government-insured
loans, and development of other mortgage products that will compete with
high cost loans.
We can only get to our goals if we know where we are. This study
looks at the current status of mortgage lending in Iowa, particularly in
the rural parts of the state. While most Iowans have access to reasonably
priced mortgage products, some members of our communities find themselves
with little choice in mortgage products. RHI wants every Iowan with
a job, who wants to own a home, to be able to develop a mutually beneficial
relationship with a reputable lender, who will work with them to help make
their home-ownership dream a reality at a price they
can truly afford.
|
|
Unfortunately some types of consumers
with good credit and some equity in their homes are targeted for
subprime refinance loans.
While some subprime loans are in the consumer’s interest,
others contain such high rates and fees that they end up harming the borrowers
and can rightfully be termed “predatory loans” because they end up putting
a borrower’s home in jeopardy. |
On the other hand, RHI’s study contains the good news
that subprime lending has not infiltrated the most rural counties as deeply
as feared.
RHI believes ... that rural Iowa’s home ownership
solutions are not dependent just on the large national lenders, but can
also be improved by partnerships between affordable housing groups
and local community lenders. |
| Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the housing
secondary market giants, have estimated that between 30% and 50% of borrowers
of subprime loans actually have credit records that should allow them to
obtain prime loans. In these cases, home equity that could be the basis
for economic development in Iowa communities is being drained away by lenders
whose corporate offices are often far away. |
|